Skip to main content

IntelliJ - You auto complete me (2)

A short one.

I've already posted about IntelliJ in the past, and judging by my enthusiastic PR for IntelliJ IDEA someone might mistake me for a share holder. Well, I'm not, though come to think of it, it might actually be a good IDEA (pardon the pun). I just love working with IDEs that understand developers and make things easier on them, and IntelliJ does just that. I've recently been brushing up my (automatic) refactoring skills, and IntelliJ has some really awesome stuff to offer in that department. Truth be told, there are some issues here and there, but hey, I have my bad days too.

All in all, for me it's done the unbelievable job of making programming in Java ... kinda fun, not a simple task by any means. I even managed to enjoy editing a bash script the other day, I mean, that's unprecedented! All that before I even had a chance to try out the Ultimate edition, as I'm working with their (free!) Community version.

Speaking of community, check out this ObsidianBlade color scheme for Java and bash by yours truly - grab it while it's hot!

To sum it up, if you're a Java developer (or Scala for that matter, as IntelliJ's support for Scala is very nice as well) you just owe it to yourself to try IntelliJ out.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sending out Storm metrics

There are a few posts talking about Storm's metrics mechanism, among which you can find Michael Noll's postJason Trost's post and the storm-metrics-statsd github project, and last but not least (or is it?)  Storm's documentation.

While all of the above provide a decent amount of information, and one is definitely encouraged to read them all before proceeding, it feels like in order to get the full picture one needs to combine them all, and even then a few bits and pieces are left missing. It is these missing bits I'll be rambling about in this post.

Dependency Injection - The good, the bad and the ugly

The Good
Dependency injection (DI, a.k.a IoC - inversion of control) is a well known technique to increase software modularity by reducing coupling between modules. To provide the benefits of DI, numerous DI frameworks have arisen (Spring, Guice, Castle Windsor, etc.) all of which essentially give you "DI capabilities" right out of the box (these frameworks tend to provide a whole lot more than just "DI capabilities", but that's not really relevant to the point I'm about to make). Now, to remove the quotes around "DI capabilities", let's define it as a DI container - a sack of objects you can manipulate using a provided API in order to wire these objects together into an object graph that makes up your application.

I've worked on quite a few projects employing Spring, so it will be my framework of reference throughout the rest of the post, but the principles and morals apply just the same.